Saturday, December 9, 2023
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Sunday, April 28, 2013
Lack of Understanding of General Excise Tax Creates Confusion
By Lowell L Kalapa @ 6:00 AM :: 4737 Views :: Taxes

Lack of Understanding of General Excise Tax Creates Confusion

by Lowell L. Kalapa, Tax Foundation of Hawaii

Hawaii’s general excise tax is the envy of every other state that imposes a retail sales tax because of its broad base, that is, it is applied to nearly every transaction that takes place in Hawaii.

Such is not the case of the retail sales taxes found in more than forty other states. Unlike the retail sales tax, which is usually imposed only on goods and then only on the end-user or consumer of the goods, Hawaii’s general excise tax is imposed not only on goods or things, but also on services and it is imposed even when the goods or services purchased will eventually be resold to someone else.

The other significant feature that differentiates the general excise tax from the retail sales tax is that it is a liability of the business selling those goods or services “for the privilege” of doing business in Hawaii whereas a retail sales tax is the liability of the customer. In those states that have a retail sales tax, the business is merely a collection agent for the city, county, or state government that levies the tax. In some cases, the business collecting the retail sales tax for the state or county is compensated for that chore by being able to retain a portion of what is collected as the sales tax. With the general excise tax, the amount paid over to the state tax collector is a percentage of what the business puts into the cash drawer, including the amount sometimes shown out as the general excise tax. The state rate, of course, is 4%, but in Honolulu the additional 0.5% for the rail system is tacked onto the basic 4% state rate.

Since the amount “passed on” to the customer as the general excise tax becomes a part of what the business collects and puts into the cash drawer, when it comes time to pay the tax collector his due, the business must pay 4% on that amount that has been passed on to the customer. As a result, that is why consumers see a rate of either 4.16% on the Neighbor Islands or 4.712% for those who live in Honolulu. Some may argue that businesses should charge only the statutory rate of $5 or 4.5%. The department of taxation is only interested in the amount being remitted to the state. However, it is against the law for a business to state that there is no general excise tax being imposed on a transaction.

Thus, while a business can show the amount of the tax out separately, that is not a requirement under the law. In fact, before the changes made to the Internal Revenue Code in 1957, businesses did not show the tax out separately because it was viewed as a tax on the gross income of the business. Only when the deduction for state sales taxes was added to the Code did the retail community pursue the IRS recognition of the tax as a “retail sales tax” for federal purposes and so the tax was shown out separately.

Today, because of price competition among businesses, nearly all businesses show the general excise tax out as a separate line item. Showing out the tax separately also helps to shift the blame to government for the added cost to the price of a product or service. However, it should be noted that merely charging the tax separately does not relieve the business of the burden of the tax. Because the 4% tax is levied on everything in the cash drawer including the amount of the tax passed on, the business must pay for a part of the general excise tax due out of his mark up or margin. When it is a business that operates on a slim profit margin, like a grocery store, the amount of the general excise tax paid out of the margin means a make-it or break-it point.

For the customer, the general excise tax is just another charge added to the bill, but for a business, the tax can determine whether or not it can stay in business. One might say, well, the tax is being passed on to the customer, so the business should be able to pay the tax and stay in business. That might be true for a business that can charge whatever it wants because the demand is high for the product or service being sold, but where there is intense price competition, the profit margin for goods or a service may not be sufficient to cover the cost of the tax that is paid out of the mark up. If that business cannot charge enough for the product or service to cover the general excise tax obligation that can’t be passed on, that business will soon be out of business.

And that is the point to underscore, because the general excise tax is a tax on gross income, it is due whether or not a business is profitable. Take, for example, a business that is having a fire sale or is going out of business sale and is selling everything below cost, the business is making no profit on those sales yet the general excise tax will still be due on the amount taken in from the fire sale.

For the average taxpayer who believes the cost of the tax can just be passed on to the customer, they don’t see that the business must still take something out of its mark up to pay the tax over and above what was passed on.

- 30 -


TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote


808 Silent Majority

Aloha Pregnancy Care Center


Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Back da Blue Hawaii

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

DVids Hawaii


Fix Oahu!

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federalist Society

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Homeschool Association

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Legal News

Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance

Hawaii Matters

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Smokers Alliance

Hawaii State Data Lab

Hawaii Together



Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Moms for Liberty

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

Investigative Project on Terrorism

July 4 in Hawaii

Kakaako Cares

Keep Hawaii's Heroes

Land and Power in Hawaii

Legislative Committee Analysis Tool

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Malama Pregnancy Center of Maui

Military Home Educators' Network Oahu

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

NAMI Hawaii

National Christian Foundation Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

NFIB Hawaii News

No GMO Means No Aloha

Not Dead Yet, Hawaii

NRA-ILA Hawaii

Oahu Alternative Transport


OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

PEACE Hawaii

People vs Machine

Practical Policy Institute of Hawaii

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii


Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

ReRoute the Rail

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

Robotics Organizing Committee

School Choice in Hawaii

Sink the Jones Act

Statehood for Guam

Talking Tax

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

UCC Truths

US Tax Foundation Hawaii Info

VAREP Honolulu

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii