Friday, September 22, 2023
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Saturday, June 25, 2011
Full Text: City Rejects Rail Bid Protests
By News Release @ 1:25 PM :: 9610 Views :: Ethics, Rail


News Release from City and County of Honolulu, Department of Budget and Fiscal Services

(Fri., June 24, 2011) – The City’s Department of Budget and Fiscal Services (BFS) has rejected two bid protests regarding the awarding of the core systems contract for the Honolulu Rail Transit Project. BFS found “no procedural or legal violations in any aspect of the procurement” for the contract.

“The protests were thoroughly reviewed, each point was considered, and on all counts the finding was that procurement law and procedures were followed throughout the evaluation and selection process,” said BFS Deputy Director Nelson Koyanagi. The City has notified the two offerors who filed protests – Sumitomo Corporation of America and Bombardier Transportations (Holdings) USA Inc. – that their claims were rejected.

The core systems contract, which consists of manufacturing the train vehicles and providing the system’s control center, was awarded to Ansaldo Honolulu in March. As to Sumitomo, despite its claims to the contrary, the City’s review found that Ansaldo was in fact a qualified offeror and Ansaldo’s proposal provided the best value for taxpayers. Sumitomo’s allegations were reviewed and found to be unsubstantiated, according to the letter from the City.

Other findings of the review include:
--Sumitomo’s allegation that Ansaldo’s pricing for the contract is higher than Sumitomo’s is simply false. While operation and maintenance costs and design-build costs varied for both vendors, the pricing evaluation was “based on the entire proposal, not individual segments,” the City’s response to Sumitomo stated. It is indisputable that the cost to taxpayers would be lower under the Ansaldo proposal considering both DB (design-build) and O&M (operation and maintenance) costs, the letter said.

Sumitomo’s allegation that Ansaldo’s pricing is imbalanced because it shifted design-build costs to operation and maintenance costs is not supported by the facts, the investigation showed. In addition, Sumitomo’s pricing with much larger payments up front is not in the taxpayers’ best interest, the review found.

--Sumitomo’s claim that the City did not properly consider Ansaldo’s past performance as part of the bid proposal is incorrect. Past performance records for all three offerors of the project, including Ansaldo, were
evaluated during the first part of the Request for Proposals (RFP) submitted by the offerors. All offerors were required to submit previous records involving completion schedule, quality of work, claims history, terminations, disciplinary actions, and safety records.

--Sumitomo’s assertion that Ansaldo was non-compliant in regards to its train control system is not factual. Ansaldo’s specifications meet the requirements of the RFP, the letter stated.

As to Bombardier, the City’s review concluded that Bombardier’s claim that the City’s contract selection process was flawed, is unfounded. This review also noted that Bombardier’s proposal did not follow the City’s guidelines.

--Bombardier’s bid proposal was submitted with conditions to cap its liability, making the bid non-responsive, or ineligible. “It is undisputed by Bombardier that its proposal was conditioned,” the letter stated. According to the letter, the City repeatedly cautioned all three offerors that conditioned proposals would be rejected. In addition, the Hawaii Administrative Rules governing procurement state: “Any offer which is conditioned upon receiving a contract other than as provided for in the solicitation shall be deemed nonresponsive and not acceptable.”

The review determined that Bombardier provided no credible reason to reverse the decision that it was non-responsive and had conditioned its proposal, and denied the company’s request to rescind the award.

The protestors may appeal these decisions within seven calendar days to the Office of Administrative Hearings at the State Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs (DCCA) by requesting an administrative hearing. The DCCA hearings officer must issue a decision within 45 days of an appeal.



TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote


808 Silent Majority

Aloha Pregnancy Care Center


Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Back da Blue Hawaii

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

DVids Hawaii


Fix Oahu!

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federalist Society

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Homeschool Association

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Legal News

Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance

Hawaii Matters

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Smokers Alliance

Hawaii State Data Lab

Hawaii Together



Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Moms for Liberty

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

Investigative Project on Terrorism

July 4 in Hawaii

Kakaako Cares

Keep Hawaii's Heroes

Land and Power in Hawaii

Legislative Committee Analysis Tool

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Malulani Foundation

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Malama Pregnancy Center of Maui

Military Home Educators' Network Oahu

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

NAMI Hawaii

National Christian Foundation Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

NFIB Hawaii News

No GMO Means No Aloha

Not Dead Yet, Hawaii

NRA-ILA Hawaii

Oahu Alternative Transport


OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

PEACE Hawaii

People vs Machine

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii


Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

ReRoute the Rail

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

Robotics Organizing Committee

School Choice in Hawaii

Sink the Jones Act

Statehood for Guam

Talking Tax

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

UCC Truths

US Tax Foundation Hawaii Info

VAREP Honolulu

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii