Monday, July 22, 2024
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Wednesday, October 19, 2016
Republican Party: Vote ‘No’ on all 20 Honolulu Charter Amendments
By News Release @ 10:38 PM :: 6174 Views :: Honolulu County, Republican Party

Honolulu County Republican Committee On the Charter Amendments

News release from Honolulu County Republican Party, October 18, 2016

The Honolulu Charter Commission’s preparation of 20 proposed changes to the Charter for the voters to approve was not adequately covered by Honolulu media. Some proposed changes are too complex to decide on the information provided. Most shift responsibility away from the elected Mayor and Council, decreasing accountability in government. Many proposed changes will affect costs, yet no information on costs is provided to the voter. One proposed amendment, number 19, would give the dominant political party control over re-districting Council districts.

Republicans expect Honolulu's elected officials themselves to take charge, see that planning is done, and carry out the people's business.

The Charter already provides sufficient powers for the Mayor, the Council, and the various commissions to supervise, organize, and assign various duties to appointed officials and the civil service workforce.

The Honolulu County Republican Party urges all Party members and all voters to vote NO on all 20 questions.

Here are the 20 questions on the ballot:

And here is the rationale for each "NO" vote:

  1. Mayor already appoints commissioners who hire and can fire the Police Chief for cause.
  2. Setting attorneys' salaries is for the Mayor to propose, and for the Council to enact by ordinance. The Ethics Commission already sets the Executive Director's salary.
  3. As is the case with other departments, the Mayor should continue to be able to withhold funds from the Department of the Prosecuting Attorney.
  4. This proposed amendment to form a Rate Commission is complex and far-reaching in its effect. The City Council should have the opportunity to consider this as a stand-alone proposal and the public should have an opportunity for more input. 
  5. The current income limits for residents of Affordable Housing Fund-assisted dwellings of less than 50 percent of the median household income should be retained. 
  6. Mayor and Council can already require departments responsible for the City's infrastructure to prepare long-term plans.
  7. No to additional bureaucracy: Mayor and Council are already the leaders.
  8. Again, this would create additional bureaucracy. Mayor and Council already have power to direct how land is managed.
  9. If Honolulu citizens want an accredited zoo, the Council can fund it.
  10. Too confusing to deserve a vote given the lack of preparation for voters.
  11. Council and Mayor can already solicit advice without creating another advisory commission.
  12. This is already the Mayor's and Council's power and responsibility.
  13. Charter shouldn't limit Mayor and Council's power to fund charities.
  14. Current requirement to hold special elections within 60 days is for promptness and a public vote. Good enough.
  15. Term limits on elected officials are in place and should remain as they are.
  16. Keeping City design and construction projects as the responsibility of the Department of Design and Construction makes more sense.
  17. Nothing wrong with continuing to require the Mayor to personally sign all documents requiring execution by the City.
  18. More commissioners are not needed.
  19. This would upset fairness and balance and potentially lock in one-party control of Council re-districting.
  20. Mayor, Mayor's appointees, and the Council can direct these changes.

Here is the Honolulu Charter:

Again, please vote “No” on all 20 questions.

Larie Manutai

Honolulu County GOP Chair


TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote


Aloha Pregnancy Care Center


Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

DVids Hawaii


Fix Oahu!

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Legal News

Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance

Hawaii Matters

Hawaii Military History

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Together


Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

July 4 in Hawaii

Land and Power in Hawaii

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

NAMI Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

NFIB Hawaii News

NRA-ILA Hawaii


OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

Practical Policy Institute of Hawaii

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii

Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

School Choice in Hawaii

Talking Tax

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii