Thursday, December 8, 2022
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Friday, June 15, 2018
Audit: State Asset Forfeiture Program -- 30 Years Without Rules
By Hawaii State Auditor @ 1:06 AM :: 5649 Views :: Judiciary, Law Enforcement, Drugs

Auditor’s Summary Audit of the Department of the Attorney General’s Asset Forfeiture Program

From Hawaii State Auditor, June, 2018, Report No. 18-09

Total Number and Dollar Amount of Administrative and Judicial Forfeitures by Type of Property for FY2006–FY2015

  • Multiple 413 forfeitures $4,745,579
  • Vehicles 597 forfeitures $2,449,654
  • Real Property 12 forfeitures $1,267,224
  • Currency 1,196 forfeitures $2,753,198
  • Firearms 4 forfeitures $1,250
  • Miscellaneous Property 39 forfeitures $368,792
  • GRAND TOTAL: $11,585,697

IN REPORT NO. 18-09, Audit of the Department of the Attorney General’s Asset Forfeiture Program, we reviewed the State’s asset forfeiture program to evaluate its efficiency and effectiveness, to determine whether the program uses its moneys for the purposes outlined in statute, to account for money and property seized and disposed of through asset forfeitures, and to determine how many asset forfeitures occurred in cases that did not result in criminal convictions. We also followed up on the recommendations made in Auditor’s Report No. 95-22, Sunset Evaluation of the Forfeiture Program.

What We Found

Our audit found that, even after nearly 30 years since the program’s inception, the department has not yet adopted administrative rules describing procedures and practice requirements for asset forfeiture. Without these rules, the program provides only informal, piecemeal guidance to law enforcement agencies and the public. We also found that the asset forfeiture program lacks policies and procedures, and has a program manager who did not guide and oversee day-to-day activities and financial management during our audit period.

Why Did These Problems Occur?

Although efforts have been made toward adoption of rules, the process has been painfully slow, and has not been a priority. In a 2005 report to the Legislature, the department identified adopting rules as a program goal, but then listed that same goal — “promulgating rules, policies and procedures pursuant to Chapter 712A, HRS, for more efficient operation” — in its 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010 reports. In 2011, the department began fielding suggestions from county prosecutors in preparation of drafting rules. In 2013, an Asset Forfeiture Task Force, made up of county prosecutors, provided comments on the department’s proposed rules. Draft rules were presented to the Attorney General for approval by mid-2014. However, we found that these rules have been languishing with the Attorney General and have yet to be adopted as of March 2018.

Why Do These Problems Matter?

One result of the lack of consistent, formal rules is the program’s high rate of dismissal of administrative forfeiture petitions, because prosecutors are unclear as to the department’s requirements for administrative forfeiture. In FY2013–FY2015, the department dismissed 107 petitions for administrative forfeiture — 14 percent of the total filed — for reasons such as lack of probable cause; failure to establish a nexus between the seized property and a covered offense; insufficient notice to property owners of forfeiture procedures; and technical errors in documents. We found dismissal rates were significantly higher on the neighbor islands compared to O‘ahu.

Rules are also needed to guide property owners who are seeking remission or mitigation of the forfeiture of their property. It’s likely that property held pending forfeiture may lose value; some property may deteriorate or fall into disrepair; and some property may become outdated or obsolete. For some owners, being deprived of their property for any period of time may result in significant hardship. Without clear rules guiding the process for requesting a pardon of the property, these effects are prolonged and exacerbated.

Additionally, without policies, procedures, and a manager to guide and oversee day-to-day activities and financial management, the program cannot fully account for the property it has obtained by forfeiture, is unable to adequately manage its funds, and cannot review or reconcile its forfeiture case data to ensure accurate reporting of information to the Legislature and the general public. 

read ... Full Report  

Reason: Hawaii Mismanaged Asset Forfeiture Program, Audit Finds 

SA: Civil forfeiture law needs reform

CB: Auditor: Hawaii AG Mismanaged Asset Seizure Program

2015: Hawaii earns a D- for Civil Forfeiture Laws

2017: Asset Forfeiture Transparency & Accountability—Hawaii Grade D+

Links

TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote

2aHawaii

808 Silent Majority

ACA Signups Hawaii

Alliance Defending Freedom

Aloha Pregnancy Care Center

American Council of Trustees and Alumni

AntiPlanner

Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Astronomy Hawaii

Back da Blue Hawaii

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Better Hawaii

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

ChinaTownWatch.com

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

DVids Hawaii

FIRE

Fix Oahu!

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Habele.org

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii Coalition Against Legalized Gambling

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Credit Union Watch

Hawaii Crop Improvement Association

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federalist Society

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii Future Project

Hawaii Gathering of Eagles

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Homeschool Association

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Legal News

Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance

Hawaii Matters

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Smokers Alliance

Hawaii State Data Lab

Hawaii Together

HIEC.Coop

HiFiCo

Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

Investigative Project on Terrorism

July 4 in Hawaii

Kakaako Cares

Keep Hawaii's Heroes

Land and Power in Hawaii

Legislative Committee Analysis Tool

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Malulani Foundation

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Malama Pregnancy Center of Maui

MentalIllnessPolicy.org

Military Home Educators' Network Oahu

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

NAMI Hawaii

Natatorium.org

National Christian Foundation Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

NFIB Hawaii News

No GMO Means No Aloha

Not Dead Yet, Hawaii

NRA-ILA Hawaii

Oahu Alternative Transport

Obookiah

OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

OurFutureHawaii.com

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

PEACE Hawaii

People vs Machine

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii

P.U.E.O.

RailRipoff.com

Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

ReRoute the Rail

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

Robotics Organizing Committee

Save Dillingham Airfield

School Choice in Hawaii

SenatorFong.com

Sink the Jones Act

Statehood for Guam

Talking Tax

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

UCC Truths

US Tax Foundation Hawaii Info

VAREP Honolulu

Waagey.org

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii

Yes2TMT