Sunday, February 28, 2021
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Thursday, July 21, 2016
IUOE ‘Hawaiian Stabilization Fund’ All But Clear of Lawsuit
By Selected News Articles @ 4:47 PM :: 4100 Views :: Ethics, Labor, Rail

Union Leaders All But Clear of Lawsuit

by Helen Christophi, Court House News, 7/21/2016

SAN FRANCISCO (CN) - A federal judge Wednesday granted summary judgment to leaders of the International Union of Operating Engineers who were accused of squandering pension funds on bad investments.

In granting summary judgment on the two remaining ERISA claims, U.S. District Judge Edward Chen found there is no question that the claims, whether based on the duty of prudence or duty of loyalty, were time-barred. Chen also denied the plaintiff union members' motion for summary adjudication as moot.

In 2013, lead plaintiff David Slack accused the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 3 - headquartered in Alameda - and 68 other defendants of violating labor management laws, the California Labor Code, ERISA and federal anti-racketeering law.

The IUOE represents heavy-equipment operators and other construction workers and is the tenth-largest union in the AFL-CIO. Local 3 is its largest branch, representing workers in California, Nevada, Utah, Hawaii and the Pacific Rim islands.

In addition to claiming that the union illegally forced members to contribute 1 percent of their salaries to a political action committee, the plaintiffs said they paid millions to the Hawaiian Stabilization Fund - an alleged multimillion-dollar slush fund for union bosses disguised as a mechanism to keep contractors from operating "double-breasted," and working both union and nonunion jobs.

The plaintiffs who brought the two remaining ERISA claims had participated in the union's pension fund, and accused the fund's trustees of breaching their fiduciary duties to union members by investing $90 million in a risky investment fund called the Longview Fund.

In considering whether the plaintiffs' claims were time-barred, Chen used the six-year statute of limitations to determine if the last breach of fiduciary duty occurred on or after Oct. 27, 2007: the plaintiffs sued on Oct. 27, 2013.

The defendants argued that the last breach occurred no later than Oct. 22, 2007, when the pension fund signed a contract to act as the Longview Fund's investment manager. But the plaintiffs said the breach occurred when the board invested money in the Longview Fund, which was after Oct. 27, 2007.

Chen cited the plaintiffs' allegation that "the pension fund trustees breached their fiduciary duties under ERISA by agreeing to invest $100,000,000 in pension fund monies, and actually investing $90,000,000 without proper due diligence, in the Longview investment," calling it "problematic."

"Plaintiffs focus on the words 'actually investing $90,000,000' but it is the subsequent phrase 'without proper due diligence' that is telling," Chen wrote. "The failure to do due diligence was in conjunction with the investigation of AB [Amalgamated Bank, the investment manager] and the Longview Fund; this alleged failure took place prior to the decision to enter into the IMA [investment management agreement] with AB on October 22, 2007."

Chen then turned to the plaintiffs' definition of a fiduciary act as the formal investment of money. The plaintiffs argued that the pension fund was not legally obligated to invest in the Longview Fund. In fact, the pension fund never made an investment, and did not breach its fiduciary duty until it transferred money to Longview's investment manager, the plaintiffs said.

But Chen noted that the investment management agreement states that the pension fund had "committed" to invest in the investment fund, and that the term "committed" implies a legal obligation.

"Accordingly, the Court concludes that, in spite of plaintiffs' attempt to characterize the breach as the actual transfer of money to AB, the 'true' breach was defendants' decision to approve, without exercising the requisite due diligence of a prudent investigation, the Longview investment and relationship with AB in the first place, which was consummated at the latest on October 22, 2007, when the IMA with AB was signed," Chen wrote.

The ruling resolves the plaintiffs' claims against all defendants except potentially two: Pete Figueiredo and Steve Ingersoll. Chen ordered the parties "to meet and confer and file a status conference statement by Aug. 11, 2016, as to whether there are still any claims against Mr. Figueiredo and Mr. Ingersoll, or whether the Court's analysis in this order is equally applicable to them."

Figueiredo and Ingersoll are "union-side trustees," as opposed to "management-side trustees."

PDF: Court Ruling


TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote


808 Silent Majority

ACA Signups Hawaii


Alliance Defending Freedom

Aloha Pregnancy Care Center

American Council of Trustees and Alumni


Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Astronomy Hawaii

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Better Hawaii

Blaisdell Memorial Project

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

Coffee Break

DVids Hawaii

E Hana Kakou Kelii Akina


Fix Oahu!

Follow the Money Hawaii

Frank in Hawaii

Front Page Magazine

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii Coalition Against Legalized Gambling

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Credit Union Watch

Hawaii Crop Improvement Association

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Advocates

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federalist Society

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii Future Project

Hawaii Gathering of Eagles

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Homeschool Association

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Life Alliance

Hawaii March for Life

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Smokers Alliance

Hawaii State Data Lab

Hawaii Together

Heritage Foundation



Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

I Vote Hawaii

If Hawaii News

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

Investigative Project on Terrorism

Iowa Meets Maui

Jackson v Abercrombie

Jihad Watch

July 4 in Hawaii

Kahle v New Hope

Kakaako Cares

Kau TEA Party

Kauai Co GOP

Keep Hawaii's Heroes


Land and Power in Hawaii

Legislative Committee Analysis Tool

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Malulani Foundation

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Malama Pregnancy Center of Maui

Mauna Kea Recreational Users Group

Middle East Forum--The Legal Project

Mililani Conservatives for Change

Military Home Educators' Network Oahu

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

Muslim Brotherhood in America

NAMI Hawaii


National Christian Foundation Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

National Wind Watch

New Hawaiian

New Zeal

NFIB Hawaii News

No GMO Means No Aloha

Northwest Economic Policy Seminar

Not Dead Yet, Hawaii

Now What I Really Think

NRA-ILA Hawaii

Oahu Alternative Transport

ObamaCare Abortion Hawaii


OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

Pacific Aviation Museum

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

PEACE Hawaii

People vs Machine

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii


Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

Republican Party -- Hawaii State

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

Robotics Organizing Committee

Save Dillingham Airfield

School Choice in Hawaii

Sink the Jones Act

Statehood for Guam

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

UCC Truths

US Tax Foundation Hawaii Info

VAREP Honolulu

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii