Friday, January 27, 2023
Hawai'i Free Press

Current Articles | Archives

Wednesday, November 26, 2014
Judge Kurren Strikes Down Hawaii County Anti-GMO Ordinance
By News Release @ 4:03 PM :: 3928 Views


From Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United November 26, 2014

The Short and Sweet Version of today's ruling on Hawaii County Bill 113... It's INVALID, which we have said all along.

In an Order issued earlier today, Judge Kurren ruled in favor of the Hawaii Floriculture and Nursery Association and all of the other Plaintiffs and against the County of Hawaii.

The Court’s Order enjoins the County from any further implementation or enforcement of Bill 113 (Ordinance 13-121, now codified as HCC §§ 14-128 et seq.).

In reaching his decision, Judge Kurren found that the County’s Ordinance:

  • “is preempted by Hawaii state law”,
  • “is, in part, expressly preempted by the federal Plant Protection Act”, and
  • “therefore … is invalid.”


  *   *   *   *   *


From Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United, November 26, 2014

“The most important thing we will need as we move into an uncertain future is the spirit of aloha. Lets all move forward together.”  Richard Ha – Hawaii Farmer

We did our best to break down the Judge’s decision today by what it really means to Hawaii and Farmers. This decision in our opinion was vital in moving us forward in this discussion.

In an Order issued earlier today, Judge Kurren ruled in favor of the Hawaii Floriculture and Nursery Association, The Hawaii Cattlemen’s Council, The Hawaii Papaya Industry, Pacific Floral Exchange, Green Point Nursery, Eric Tanouye, Jason Moniz, Ross Sibucao, Gordon Inouye  and all of the Plaintiffs and against the County of Hawaii.  The Court’s Order enjoins the County from any further implementation or enforcement of Bill 113 (Ordinance 13-121, now codified as HCC §§ 14-128 et seq.).

In reaching his decision, Judge Kurren found that the County’s Ordinance: “is preempted by Hawaii state law”, “is, in part, expressly preempted by the federal Plant Protection Act”, and “therefore … is invalid.”

In addition:

The Court rejected the County’s assertion that the Plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge Bill 113.  Specifically, the Court held that Plaintiffs Pacific Floral Exchange and Gordon Inouye had established that they “use their property for a particular use—i.e., field testing—and that they suffer injury when the continued use of their property for such purpose is threatened by the Ordinance.”  Under the law, because Plaintiffs Pacific Floral and Gordon Inouye have standing, the Court could proceed to decide the challenge without specifically determining the standing of the remaining plaintiffs.

  • On the issue of state preemption, the Court found that:  “In light of the comprehensive [state] statutes and the network designed to address statewide agriculture problems, the Court concludes that legislative intent for an exclusive, uniform, and comprehensive state statutory scheme on the precise subject matter addressed by [the] Ordinance preempts the County’s ban on genetically engineered organisms.  Accordingly, Ordinance 13-121 is invalid.”  The Court also rejected the County’s argument that the state pre-emption issue should be decided by the Hawaii Supreme Court.
  • The Court held that Bill 113 is pre-empted by federal law, and therefore is invalid, to the extent the Ordinance bans field testing of plants subject to regulation by the United States Department of Agriculture pursuant to the Plant Protection Act and its regulations:   “Specifically, the Court concludes that the ban is preempted to the extent it prohibits field testing of ‘regulated articles’ under 7 C.F.R Part 340 that are ‘plant pests’ or ‘noxious weeds.’”
  • The Court did not agree with Plaintiffs that Bill 113 is invalid because it stands as an obstacle to the general cultivation of genetically engineered plants ensured by the Plant Protection Act or the federal government’s Coordinated Framework for Regulation of Biotechnology.  This holding does not impact the Court’s decision that Bill 113 is invalid.
  • Finally, the Court rejected the County’s argument that the Court’s decision as to Plaintiffs’ challenge should be deferred until the County had the opportunity to take discovery from the Plaintiffs.  In the Court’s view, the County had sufficient time to conduct discovery and discovery would not have changed the outcome.

Judge Kurren’s Order disposes of the case and it is now up to the County to decide whether to seek an appeal.

Mahalo to all the farmers and ranchers who United their organizations to stand up against this challenge and fought hard to achieve this result.

  *   *   *   *   *

HTH: Kurren is also the magistrate judge for a similar challenge to Maui County’s new law banning cultivation of genetically modified organisms


TEXT "follow HawaiiFreePress" to 40404

Register to Vote


808 Silent Majority

ACA Signups Hawaii

Alliance Defending Freedom

Aloha Pregnancy Care Center

American Council of Trustees and Alumni


Antonio Gramsci Reading List

A Place for Women in Waipio

Astronomy Hawaii

Back da Blue Hawaii

Ballotpedia Hawaii

Better Hawaii

Broken Trust

Build More Hawaiian Homes Working Group

Christian Homeschoolers of Hawaii

Cliff Slater's Second Opinion

DVids Hawaii


Fix Oahu!

Frontline: The Fixers

Genetic Literacy Project

Grassroot Institute

Hawaii Aquarium Fish Report

Hawaii Aviation Preservation Society

Hawaii Catholic TV

Hawaii Christian Coalition

Hawaii Cigar Association

Hawaii Coalition Against Legalized Gambling

Hawaii ConCon Info

Hawaii Credit Union Watch

Hawaii Crop Improvement Association

Hawaii Debt Clock

Hawaii Defense Foundation

Hawaii Family Forum

Hawaii Farmers and Ranchers United

Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

Hawaii Federalist Society

Hawaii Federation of Republican Women

Hawaii Future Project

Hawaii Gathering of Eagles

Hawaii History Blog

Hawaii Homeschool Association

Hawaii Jihadi Trial

Hawaii Legal News

Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance

Hawaii Matters

Hawaii's Partnership for Appropriate & Compassionate Care

Hawaii Public Charter School Network

Hawaii Rifle Association

Hawaii Shippers Council

Hawaii Smokers Alliance

Hawaii State Data Lab

Hawaii Together



Hiram Fong Papers

Homeschool Legal Defense Hawaii

Honolulu Navy League

Honolulu Traffic

House Minority Blog

Imua TMT

Inouye-Kwock, NYT 1992

Inside the Nature Conservancy

Inverse Condemnation

Investigative Project on Terrorism

July 4 in Hawaii

Kakaako Cares

Keep Hawaii's Heroes

Land and Power in Hawaii

Legislative Committee Analysis Tool

Lessons in Firearm Education

Lingle Years

Malulani Foundation

Managed Care Matters -- Hawaii

Malama Pregnancy Center of Maui

Military Home Educators' Network Oahu

Missile Defense Advocacy

MIS Veterans Hawaii

NAMI Hawaii

National Christian Foundation Hawaii

National Parents Org Hawaii

NFIB Hawaii News

No GMO Means No Aloha

Not Dead Yet, Hawaii

NRA-ILA Hawaii

Oahu Alternative Transport


OHA Lies

Opt Out Today

Patients Rights Council Hawaii

PEACE Hawaii

People vs Machine

Pritchett Cartoons

Pro-GMO Hawaii


Rental by Owner Awareness Assn

ReRoute the Rail

Research Institute for Hawaii USA

Rick Hamada Show

RJ Rummel

Robotics Organizing Committee

Save Dillingham Airfield

School Choice in Hawaii

Sink the Jones Act

Statehood for Guam

Talking Tax

Tax Foundation of Hawaii

The Real Hanabusa

Time Out Honolulu

Trustee Akina KWO Columns

UCC Truths

US Tax Foundation Hawaii Info

VAREP Honolulu

West Maui Taxpayers Association

What Natalie Thinks

Whole Life Hawaii